Schedule slippage
Missed milestones and delayed business benefits.
Get to Green · Project Performance Intelligence
FROM RED TO RECOVERY.
Turn project uncertainty into controlled, measurable recovery.
When delivery slips, costs escalate and confidence deteriorates, reporting tells you what has gone wrong. Mantiva360 helps you understand why, assess the consequences and take control.
Connect project performance, financial intelligence and corrective action to recover delivery confidence, protect investment and reduce avoidable financial exposure.
45 secRead the film description
A Red delivery position becomes the starting point for assessment. The film follows cost and schedule review, action ownership and a fresh verification check. Missing financial inputs remain visible. The demonstration ends with recovery still unverified: a plan and completed actions alone do not prove recovery. Spoken captions appear within the film.
- Accelerate recovery decisions
- Reduce avoidable financial exposure
- Restore delivery confidence
01 / Recognise the warning signs
Projects rarely fail without warning.
The warning signs are often visible long before recovery becomes expensive.
Major transformation programmes generate enormous amounts of delivery information. Yet leaders can struggle to establish a reliable view of progress, completion costs and emerging risks.
By the time a programme is formally Red, schedule disruption, additional resource costs, contractual exposure and declining confidence may already be affecting delivery commitments.
Cost escalation
Increasing forecast completion costs.
Resource constraints
Reduced delivery capacity and productivity.
Unresolved dependencies
Blocked activities and downstream disruption.
Weak evidence and governance
Unreliable progress and acceptance reporting.
Fragmented recovery planning
Corrective actions disconnected from financial forecasts.
The costliest problem is not always the original delay. It is the time lost before effective corrective action begins.
- Early warning
- Delivery deterioration
- Financial exposure
- Recovery intervention
02 / The recovery framework
A structured path from project distress to delivery confidence.
Detect. Decide. Act. Verify.
Bring relevant delivery controls together to understand the problem, assess recovery options, implement corrective actions and validate the result. Spend less time reconciling spreadsheets, presentations and action registers.
- 01
Detect
Understand the real project position.
Bring critical findings, delivery performance and data confidence into one prioritised review.
In the applicationConfirm position
Explore the controls
- 360 Cockpit and Project Health findings.
- Schedule and financial performance.
- Current forecasts and capacity constraints.
- Risks, issues and dependencies.
- Evidence, acceptance and assessment qualifications.
OutcomeA clearer understanding of what requires intervention.
- 02
Decide
Understand the impact before committing.
Compare the current outlook with modelled options and retain the assumptions behind the decision.
In the applicationCompare options
Explore the controls
- Original commitments and approved baseline.
- Current cost and schedule outlook.
- Remaining effort and resource requirements.
- Forecast, Delivery Plan and Change Request scenarios.
- Expected cost, risks, trade-offs and approval requirements.
OutcomeAn informed, financially credible recovery decision.
- 03
Act
Turn decisions into governed execution.
Establish authority, assign accountable actions and update delivery controls through their existing workflows.
In the applicationApprove response
Explore the controls
- Corrective action ownership and responsibilities.
- Recovery milestones and required outcomes.
- Delivery Plan and resource forecast adjustments.
- Formal Change Requests where commitments change.
- Supporting evidence and management accountability.
OutcomeA recovery plan connected to delivery execution.
- 04
Verify
Prove that recovery is working.
Recheck source conditions, action outcomes and current performance. Review what remains exposed.
In the applicationTrack recovery
Explore the controls
- Updated delivery health and confidence.
- Progress against recovery commitments.
- Schedule and forecast changes across assessments.
- Completed actions, outcomes and evidence.
- Remaining exposure and sustained recovery criteria.
OutcomeAn evidence-supported view of progress and remaining exposure.
03 / Financial recovery intelligence
What will recovery really cost?
A recovery plan without financial visibility is another project risk.
Adding resources or extending dates can change cost, schedule, margin and business outcomes. Evaluate delivery cost and schedule implications before committing capacity or changing delivery commitments. Commercial judgement remains with your authorised team.
Original Commitment
Understand original delivery and commercial commitments, separately from the approved cost baseline.
Current Outlook
Examine forecast completion cost, delivery dates and remaining capacity requirements.
Recovery Investment
Model the effort, resources and expenditure associated with proposed corrective action.
Forecast Consequences
Compare modelled completion cost, finish dates and cost movement, with qualifications visible.
Financial Accountability
Connect authorised recovery decisions to controls, forecast updates and subsequent verification.
Know the cost of doing nothing. Understand the cost of intervention. Make the recovery decision with confidence.
70 secRead the film description
The film separates original commitment, approved baseline and the current outlook. Demonstration figures show missing actual and forecast costs as unavailable. Recovery responses involve capacity, time and delivery trade-offs. A draft scenario is not an approved commitment, and the demonstration does not establish a validated cost improvement. Spoken captions appear within the film.
Know the impact before you commit
Recovery decisions should be commercially defensible.
Discover how Mantiva360 helps project leaders assess financial exposure, understand recovery investment and evaluate the consequences of corrective action.
Compare a proposed response with continuing on the current plan. Where reliable cost, schedule or capacity inputs are missing, the assessment shows the gap.
Discuss your recovery decision04 / Accelerate the next decision
Less time diagnosing.
More time recovering.
Connect insight, decisions and execution in one governed environment.
Traditional recovery can mean assembling information from multiple systems, reconciling spreadsheets and manually tracking actions. Mantiva360 connects relevant project-control information so leaders can focus on the response.
Early identification
Surface emerging delivery issues before they become more difficult to resolve.
Connected project controls
Reduce the fragmentation involved in reconciling delivery information.
Financial visibility
Understand the cost and forecast implications of recovery decisions.
Governed corrective action
Establish ownership, accountability and execution discipline.
Evidence-based verification
Assess whether corrective action has produced its intended result.
Executive visibility
Communicate recovery progress and remaining exposure more clearly.
Mantiva360 does not simply tell you that a project is Red. It helps you understand what needs to change and whether the intervention is working.
Earlier intervention, informed decisions and stronger cost control can help reduce avoidable financial loss. The outcome depends on reliable inputs, sound judgement and effective execution.
05 / The recovery journey
From uncertainty to a controlled recovery position.
| Without connected recovery controls | With Mantiva360 Get to Green |
|---|---|
| Fragmented project information | Connected delivery intelligence |
| Reactive status reporting | Earlier identification of critical findings |
| Unclear financial exposure | More transparent cost and forecast implications |
| Informal recovery actions | Governed corrective action ownership |
| Disconnected resource forecasts | Recovery planning linked to resource requirements |
| Subjective recovery confidence | Evidence-supported recovery assessment |
| Manual executive reconciliation | More consistent management reporting |
The objective is not simply to change a Red status indicator to Green. It is to establish a sustainable, measurable and defensible delivery position.
Closing findings administratively does not establish recovery. Current source conditions, recorded outcomes and supporting evidence must withstand verification.
06 / Built for complex transformation
Built for programmes where delivery confidence matters.
For resource-intensive programmes where commitments, financial exposure and operational dependencies must be managed together.
SAP and ERP Transformations
Support recovery planning across implementation, migration, testing, cutover and deployment. Explore SAP Delivery →
Enterprise Technology Programmes
Connect the delivery picture across infrastructure, application modernisation and technology initiatives.
Business Transformation
Link milestones, resource commitments and corrective actions to transformation outcomes.
Programme Management Offices
Support consistent project recovery governance, financial visibility and executive reporting.
07 / Get to Green in action
See the recovery process in action.
From critical findings to evidence-supported recovery decisions.
Follow the condition from its source to an accountable response. These product captures use demonstration data; the films above show the recovery assessment workflow.
- 01 / Identify
Find what needs intervention.
Review critical findings and Project Health in the 360 Cockpit. Follow the affected record to understand the condition behind the signal.
- 02 / Assess
Open the recovery assessment.
In the 360 Cockpit, open the Panoramic Cockpit and choose Assess recovery. Use Confirm position to assess saved source records and review qualifications.
- 03 / Understand
Establish cost and schedule exposure.
Distinguish original commitment, the approved baseline at recovery entry and the current outlook. Review unavailable inputs before relying on a financial comparison.
- 04 / Compare
Assess the response before committing.
Use Compare options with linked Forecast, Delivery Plan or Change Request scenarios. Review proposed expenditure, finish dates, capacity and assumptions. Unmodelled options retain the current outlook.
- 05 / Execute
Give the response authority and ownership.
Use Approve response to establish the route. Maintain actions and evidence in their registers. Changes to approved commitments follow the existing Change Request approval process.
- 06 / Verify
Recheck the result and remaining exposure.
In Track recovery, choose Verify recovery now. Review current health, source conditions, action evidence and remaining constraints. A changed or stale position requires reassessment.
08 / Make the next decision with control
Your project may be Red. Your recovery strategy doesn't have to be.
Whether your programme faces schedule pressure, escalating costs or declining delivery confidence, establish a clear view of the position and a governed path forward.
Discover how connected project controls, financial intelligence and evidence-based recovery can help your organisation regain control.
Demo requests open your email app. You can also contact [email protected].
See it early. Understand the impact. Take control.